A fresh ceasefire deal has been struck between Nigerian authorities and one of the country’s most feared criminal leaders, Bello Turji, in Zamfara State—an epicenter of years-long banditry, mass kidnappings, and violent unrest in Nigeria’s northwest. But even as farming activities cautiously resume and weapons are reportedly surrendered, many security analysts and residents are warning: this may be yet another pause in violence, not the beginning of peace.
Turji, a 31-year-old former cattle herder turned warlord, has built a bloody reputation over the past decade, orchestrating deadly raids on villages, mass abductions, and highway ambushes across Zamfara, Sokoto, and beyond. Known for releasing threatening videos and resisting past government offensives, Turji's latest truce came after a string of backchannel negotiations involving federal officials and prominent Muslim clerics.
According to a confidential August 5 conflict monitoring report prepared for the United Nations, the ceasefire was brokered after three face-to-face meetings with Turji in his heavily fortified stronghold in Fakai village. The delegation, led by Kaduna-based Salafi cleric Musa Yusuf Asadus-Sunnah, also included other religious mediators and representatives from the federal security apparatus.
As part of the deal, Turji agreed to:
End attacks on communities in the Shinkafi district
Cease cattle rustling and kidnappings
Release 32 captives in clerical custody
Hand over a limited number of weapons
Call off retaliatory actions against Fulani civilians
Turji reportedly secured in return a halt in counterattacks by local vigilantes and tacit protection for his Fulani kinsmen, who have often found themselves targets of ethnically driven reprisals.
A Troubled Truce History
This is not Turji’s first agreement with authorities—and that, according to observers, is part of the problem.
"He's signed peace deals before and broken them without hesitation," said Mannir Fura-Girke, a northern Nigeria-based security analyst. "The reality is, these truces are tactical—used as a survival strategy when military pressure increases."
The latest ceasefire followed a series of offensives launched by Zamfara's government in July, in coordination with local vigilantes and anti-jihadist militias. Several of Turji’s men were reportedly killed in the fighting, and the bandit leader himself was briefly forced to flee to Jigawa state to escape a military sweep of his hideout.
Analysts say such pressure often compels bandits to negotiate—not from goodwill, but from necessity.
Relief, but Caution, in Shinkafi
For now, the ceasefire has yielded some short-term benefits. Residents of Shinkafi district have begun returning to farmlands previously deemed too dangerous to cultivate. "Since our last talks, the area has not recorded any attacks," Asadus-Sunnah confirmed in a video statement posted online.
Still, not all residents are convinced the truce will hold.
“We’ve seen this movie before,” said Hamisu Aliyu, a community member in Shinkafi. “Only military force can stop them. They’ll stop today and come back tomorrow—stronger, more armed, and more violent.”
A Cycle of Truces and Betrayals
The Nigerian government has intermittently relied on peace deals to pacify heavily armed bandit groups, often when military solutions prove ineffective or unsustainable. However, most agreements have failed, either due to government neglect, lack of enforcement, or strategic betrayal by the bandits themselves.
Even when localized peace holds—as in a similar agreement struck in Binin Gwari, Kaduna State—attacks often spike elsewhere, as armed groups exploit newly created safe zones to regroup, rearm, or expand operations.
Security experts warn that without addressing the root causes—land conflict between herders and farmers, climate change, poverty, and a chronically absent state—these truces amount to little more than temporary bandages.
“Banditry has become a multi-million-dollar enterprise,” Fura-Girke said. “Ransom payments, protection taxes on farmers, cattle theft—it’s too profitable for these groups to walk away, no matter how many peace deals are signed.”
Government Silence Raises Eyebrows
Despite the significance of the new deal, federal authorities have remained tight-lipped. A spokesperson from the Office of the National Security Adviser declined to comment when contacted.
For now, observers are watching closely—aware that peace in Zamfara hangs on a fragile and often manipulated balance.
Post a Comment